Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7287 (UTT)

MOHD HASAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/931/2025 · 2025-07-11

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 931 of 2025 Mohd. Hasan ........Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. K.S. Dugtal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Vijay Khanduri, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant Mohd. Hasan is in judicial custody in FIR No. 382 of 2023 dated 22.12.2023, under Section 29 read with Section 8/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. According to the FIR, on 21.12.2023, smack was recovered from the co-accused. During investigation, it was revealed that, in fact, the co-accused Uma had been transferring money in an account, which was being operated by the applicant and it is the applicant, who along with the other co-accused sold the smack. There have been some transactions also. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that nothing was recovered from him; in his account, money was never deposited. 5. Learned State Counsel submits that through UPI transactions, money was being transferred in an account, which was 2 being operated by the applicant, though he admits that the account was not in the name of the applicant; it was in the name of his father. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 11.07.2025 Avneet/