VIDYA CHANDRAKANT BEDAKE AND ORS. v. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
IA/11381/2025 · 2025-12-08
Shri Shivkumar Dige
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72844 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72844 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
50-IA-11381-2025 (C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11381 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1623 OF 2025 Vidya Chandrakant Bedake And Ors. ...Applicants IN THE MATTER BETWEEN The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. ….Appellant Versus Vidya Chandrakant Bedake And Ors. ...Respondents ----- Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar with Mr. R. Patil, Advocate for the Applicants. Ms. Karishma Jhaveri, Advocate for the Appellant – Insurance Company. -----
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 8th DECEMBER, 2025.
P.C. :
1. By this application, the Applicants are seeking withdrawal of the amount.
2. It is contention of learned counsel for the Applicants that the deceased was the sole earning member of the Applicants’ family. They have no source of income. They need the amount for their daily expenses. Hence, requested to allow the application.
3. It is contention of learned counsel for the Appellant – Insurance Company that the Tribunal has considered monthly income Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/2 SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2025.12.11 12:03:47 +0530
50-IA-11381-2025 (C).doc of the deceased on higher side. Learned counsel further submitted that the Tribunal has also applied wrong multiplier and the accident occurred due to sole negligence of the deceased, but these facts are not considered by the Tribunal, and requested to reject the application.
4. I have heard both learned counsel.
5. The deceased was the sole earning members of the Applicants’ family. The have no source of income. They need the amount for their daily expenses. The issue raised by the learned counsel for the Appellant – Insurance Company can be considered at the time of final hearing of the appeal.
6. In view of above, I pass following order:
ORDER i. The application is allowed. ii. The Applicants are permitted to withdraw the 50% amount, out of deposited amount along with accrued interest thereon, on furnishing undertaking.
7. The interim application stands disposed off.
( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 2/2