Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72843 (ALL)

SUBHRA RAI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/9212/2025 · 2025-07-09

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110303 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9212 of 2025 Petitioner :- Subhra Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prince Kumar Srivastava,Sheetala Prasad Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Prince Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2&3 and Mr. Hare Ram, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to consider the request for change/updating of mobile number and permit the petitioner to submit the transfer application manually or reopen the portal so that he can submit his application and further prayer to direct the respondents to decide the representation dated 13.06.2025 given by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though in e-service book of the petitioner, he had mentioned the correct details including the mobile number, however, could not move the application for correction of mobile number in the transfer application within the stipulated time. A representation has been moved for the aforesaid request on 13.06.2025, but till date nothing has been done. Hence the present writ petition has been filed. Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2&3, on the basis of instructions, submits that last date for making any correction in the transfer application was 21.03.2025 as directed by District Basic Education Officer, Sant Kabir Nagar, copy of the instructions has been passed on to the Court today, is kept on record. She further submits that as the application requesting for correction of mobile number has not been moved before the last date, therefore, no interference is required at this stage. However, she submits that in case a fresh representation is given before the authority concerned making her request, the same shall be considered and decided for the next session, in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2- District Basic Education Officer, Sant Kabir Nagar, raising all her grievances within a period of two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, by reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order if there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad