Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72831 (BOM)

UPENDRA SON OF CHANDRA VIJAY YADAV v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH HATKANANGALE RUKADI POLICE STATION

BA/4917/2024 · 2025-11-26

Shri Shivkumar Dige

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

40-BA-4917-2024 (CR)..doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4917 OF 2024 Upendra Son Of Chandra Vijay Yadav …. Applicant Versus State Of Maharashtra Through Hatkanangale Rukadi Police Station …. Respondent ----- Adv. Rashmi Kulkarni a/w Mr. Ashish Kachole and Mr. Amitabh Singh, Advocate for the Applicant. Dr. A. A. Takalkar, A.P.P., for the Respondent – State. API, Pallavi Yadav, Hatkanangale Police Station – present. ----- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 26th NOVEMBER, 2025. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State. 2. Learned counsel for the Applicant fairly submitted that the bail application is filed before the learned trial Court by an Advocate appointed through the Legal Services Authority. 3. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the Applicant as bail application is pending before the learned trial Court, this bail application cannot be considered and dismissed and disposed off. ( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/1 SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2025.11.27 19:53:30 +0530