CRWP-12925- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (111 ) VIKRAM VERMA ALIAS VIKRAM OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer in this petition has been made by the petitioners for directing the respondents liberty at the hands of the private respondents 2. On perusal of the record, it has been revealed that the FIR 72 dated 1.8.20 Malerkotla and FIR Malerkotla have been registered as against the petiti statements recorded by Ravinder Verma and Manish Verma respectively. The stand taken -2025 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision : 27.05.2026 VIKRAM VERMA ALIAS VIKRAM KUMAR Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition has been made by the petitioners for directing the respondents No.1 to 4 to ensure protection of their lives and liberty at the hands of the private respondents No. n perusal of the record, it has been revealed that the FIR 72 dated 1.8.2025 registered at Police Station City Ahmedgarh, District Malerkotla and FIR No.75 dated 5.8.2025 at City Ahmedgarh, District Malerkotla have been registered as against the petiti statements recorded by Ravinder Verma and Manish Verma respectively. taken by the petitioners is that these FIRs IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-12925-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.05.2026 KUMAR VERMA AND ... Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners DAG, Punjab Prayer in this petition has been made by the petitioners for 1 to 4 to ensure protection of their lives and No.5 to 12. n perusal of the record, it has been revealed that the FIR No. 5 registered at Police Station City Ahmedgarh, District 75 dated 5.8.2025 at City Ahmedgarh, District Malerkotla have been registered as against the petitioners on the basis of statements recorded by Ravinder Verma and Manish Verma respectively. these FIRs are based on false AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.28 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-12925- allegations and that they are apprehending danger to at the hands of private respondents, who FIR. 3. It is submitted in the reply the petition has been filed with an intent to create a defen with the due process of law. Learned State Counsel has submitted that no threat to the lives and safety of the petitioners has been made out. It is also submitted that t The petitioners have also not given any specific substanc stand as taken by them. 4. In view of the discussion considered opinion that the petitioners have failed to make out any ground seeking protection at the hands of respondents finding no compelling ground, the petition is dismissed. 27.05.2026 Amit Sharma -2025 (O&M) (2) allegations and that they are apprehending danger to nds of private respondents, who are lodgers of the It is submitted in the reply filed by the respondent the petition has been filed with an intent to create a defen the due process of law. Learned State Counsel has submitted that no threat to the lives and safety of the petitioners has been made out. It is also submitted that the complaint filed by the petitioner The petitioners have also not given any specific substanc stand as taken by them. In view of the discussion so made, this court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners have failed to make out any ground seeking protection at the hands of respondents finding no compelling ground, the petition is dismissed. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No allegations and that they are apprehending danger to their lives and liberty are lodgers of the above-named filed by the respondent-State that the petition has been filed with an intent to create a defence and to interfere the due process of law. Learned State Counsel has submitted that no threat to the lives and safety of the petitioners has been made out. It is also filed by the petitioner already stands filed. The petitioners have also not given any specific substance justifying the so made, this court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners have failed to make out any ground seeking protection at the hands of respondents No.5 to 12. Accordingly, finding no compelling ground, the petition is dismissed. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.28 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.