SRI SAHEBLAL S/O BABALAL BANI v. SRI KUTUBU S/O BABALAL BANI
WP/107609/2023 · 2025-04-03
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7281 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7281 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5933 WP No. 107609 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 107609 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI. SAHEBLAL S/O BABALAL BANI, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: TEACHERS COLONY, JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI.PRANAV BADAGI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.B. HEBBALLI, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
SRI. KUTUBU S/O BABALAL BANI, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KANKANWADI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT-591 222.
2.
SMT. BANUBI W/O SAHEBLAL KORABU, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: TUNGAL, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587 330.
3.
SRI. HAJISAB S/O BABALAL BANI, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KANKANWADI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT-591 222.
4.
SMT. RAMEEJA W/O PAIGAMBAR MULLA, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: KADAKOL, TQ: JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587 311.
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5933 WP No. 107609 of 2023
5.
SMT. ASHAMA W/O MAINUDDIN HIPPARAGI, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: MOMIN GALLI, JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587 301. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Pranav Badagi., counsel on behalf of Sri.S.B.Hebballi., for the petitioner has appeared in person.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by advocate on record and the petitioner about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5933 WP No. 107609 of 2023
The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 1