120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7117-2025 DECIDED ON: 07.07.2025 SUNIL KUMAR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG Haryana SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for a direction to the respondents to protect the life and liberty of te petitioner and his family by providing adequate police protection for their safety. At the outset, learned State counsel informs the Court that, in response to the representation dated 07.03.2010 (Annexure P-4) submitted by the petitioner, and after due consideration and examination of the same, the requisite protection was granted on 02.06.2025. In the light of above, nothing survives in the petition. According, the petition is disposed off, having been rendered infructuous. However, in case the aforesaid statement is found to be incorrect, the petitioner would be at liberty to move necessary application for revival of the instant petition. Ordered accordingly. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 07.07.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No MEENU 2025.07.07 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document