9-CP-455-2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 455 OF 2018 Chandkhan Almoddin Mulani … Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra Thr Secretary, And Ors … Respondents —————— Mr. Satish Raut for the Petitioner. Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram : M. S. Karnik & Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ. Date : November 24, 2025. P. C. : 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions. In any event, we ind that, with the passage of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. If the petitioner’s representation has not yet been decided, the time for deciding the representation is extended by a further period of six weeks from today. 2. Learned AGP to communicate the order to Respondents. 3. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the decision taken on the representation, if so advised. Shubham Talle 1 of 2 TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2025.11.25 12:45:23 +0530 9-CP-455-2018.doc 4. Writ Petition stands disposed of. [ Ajit B. Kadethankar, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik, J. ] Shubham Talle 2 of 2