Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115618 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23754 of 2025 Applicant :- Viky @ Vikas Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gyan Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Gyan Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No.118 of 2025, under Sections 333, 115(2), 351(2), 309(6), 61(2), 3(5), 112 BNS, Police Station- Medical, District Meerut. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was not named in the FIR though allegation was made in the FIR that some unknown persons came into house of first informant and tried to commit robbery and on resistance, they have also beaten the informant and his son. Subsequently, police arrested nine persons including the applicant in which name of the applicant was surfaced though there was no recovery of any incriminating articles from the possession of the applicant and he has been falsely implicated. It is further submitted that co-accused Kuldeep Kumar, Kapil, Lalit @ Bittu and Manish Solanki have already been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.19154 of 2025, 19254 of 2025, 19207 of 2025 and 21266 of 2025 vide orders dated 23.06.2025, 24.06.2025 and 27.06.2025 respectively. Therefore, he is seeking parity with the aforesaid co-accused. He further submitted that the charge sheet has been filed by the police, therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation. The applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 15.04.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Viky @ Vikas involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 17.7.2025 A.Kr. Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad