Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110667 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9274 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition with the prayer to direct the respondents to pay the remaining stipend to each candidates of V.B.T.C. 2004, i.e. Rs.20,000/- with interest. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the controversy involved in the present petition has already been decided by this Court in Writ A-No. 15502 of 2022 (Avneesh Pandey and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) decided on 27.09.2022. Relevant part of the said order reads thus: "Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, the Court is of the opinion that the matter as regards the payment of stipend to the petitioners can be better addressed by the Secretary Basic Education, U.P., Lucknow at the first instance. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by requiring the petitioners to move an appropriate representation clearly setting forth their claims for payment of stipend in terms of Clause 3(12) of the Government Order dated 14.1.2004 within a period of two weeks from today. In the eventuality of such a representation being made within the time granted, it is expected that the Secretary Basic Education, U.P., Lucknow shall proceed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders after considering all aspects of the matter including various directions issued by the Apex Court as also this Court from time to time, expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation along with certified copy of this order." 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are also entitled for the same relief. 5. Learned Standing Counsel also admitted that the controversy involved in the present petition has also been covered with the aforesaid judgement passed in Avneesh Pandey (supra). 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by requiring the petitioner to move an appropriate representation clearly setting forth their claims for payment of stipend in terms of Clause 3(12) of the Government Order dated 14.1.2004 within a period of two weeks from today. 7. In the eventuality of such a representation being made within two weeks, it is expected that the Secretary Basic Education, U.P., Lucknow shall proceed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders after considering all aspects of the matter including various directions issued by the Apex Court as also this Court from time to time, expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 DS Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad