- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53617 CRL.RP No. 398 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 398 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI T.R.ANANDAPPA, S/O V RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O NO.10, OLD NO. 78/2, T R ANANDAPPA BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, THINDLU MAINROAD, VIDYARANYAPRUA POST, BENGALURU - 560 097. WORKING AT SRI T R ANANDAPPA @ T R ANAND, SECURTIY HAVALDAR, BMTC 30TH DEPO PUTTENAHALLI, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. …PETITIONER [BY SRI SATHISH S P., ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: SRI H G BASAVARAJU, S/O.GURUBASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O NO.248/26, 3RD MAIN, GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU -560 032. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. BABITA, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401(FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) CR.P.C PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.02.2025 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.1102/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE COURT OF THE LII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-53) BENGALURU WHEREIN THE COURT BELOW WAS PLEASED TO DISMISSED BY CONFIRMED THE JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION PASSED BY THE TRIAL COURT IN C.C.NO.15181/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53617 CRL.RP No. 398 of 2025 XVIII ADDL. CMM BENGALURU BY JUDGMENT DATED 13.07.2023. THE ACCUSED SHALL PAY SENTENCE OF FINE OF RS.6,95,000/- IN DEFAULT HE SHALL UNDERGO SI FOR SIX MONTHS AND TO PAY THE RS.6,90,000/- TO THE COMPLAINT AND TO DEPOSIT FINE AMOUNT OF RS.5000/- TO THE STATE OUT OF FINE AMOUNT FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 138 OF NI ACT AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT IN C.C.NO.15181/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE HO NBLE XVIII ACMM AT BENGALURU BY JUDGMENT DATED 13.07.2023. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Counsel for respondent is present. None for petitioner. Even on previous dates, there is no representation. This would indicate that petitioner is not pursuing matter diligently. 2. Revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE Psg* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53