BABURAM SARKAR AND ORS v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM(A)/842/2025 · 2025-12-22
Tapabrata Chakraborty
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72711 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72711 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI APPELLATE SIDE 22.12.2025 Court No.01 rpan/15 CRM (A) 842 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure); And In Re: Baburam Sarkar & Others - Petitioners.
Mr. Sudip Guha ...for the Petitioners. Mr. Nilay Chakraborty, Mr. Chattu Roy ...for the State.
Apprehending arrest in connection with Sitai Police Station Case no.222 of 2024 dated 22.11.2024 under Sections 20(a)(i)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the present application has been preferred. Mr. Guha, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated on the rudiments of unfounded allegations. Upon completion of investigation chargesheet has also been submitted and as such, custodial interrogation of the petitioners may not be necessary. Mr. Chakraborty, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State opposes such prayer and draws the attention of this Court to the seizure list and the statement of the witnesses. Having heard the learned advocates and considering the documents in the case diary, the nature of accusations and the extent of complicity of the petitioners in the alleged offence, I am not inclined to exercise discretion in their favour.
2 The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 842 of 2025, accordingly, is dismissed. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)