Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72708 (KAR)

SMT. SHARADA v. SRI. MOHAN RAJ. S

MFA/7503/2022 · 2025-08-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA & SMT. K.M.ARCHANA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.7503/2022 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.5564/2025) BETWEEN 1 . SMT. SHARADA W/O LATE C.NAGARAJA NOW AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 2 . C. JASWANTH S/O LATE C.NAGARAJA NOW AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS, 3 . C. KUSHANTH S/O LATE C.NAGARAJA, NOW AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, 4 . CHOWDAMMA W/O C. NARAYANA, NOW AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NOTE: THE APPELLANT NOS.2 AND 3 ARE SINCE MINORS, REP. BY THEIR MOTHER N/G I.E., APPELLANT NO.1 2 PRESENTLY R/AT MAYAPPANAHALLI, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE. PERMANENT ADDRESS: JANGALAPALE, R.NADIMPALLE, RAMASAMUDRAM MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT-517 417, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RANGEGOWDA N.R, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . SRI. MOHAN RAJ. S AGED MAJOR, S/O SRI. RAMA, NO.404, NEHA PASSION APARTMENTS, 3RD CROSS, ROOPENA AGRAHARA, BANGALORE-560 068. 2 . ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INS CO. LTD NO.30, 3RD FLOOR, JNR CITY, CENTER RAJARAM MOHAN ROY RODA, SAMPANGIRAMA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 10.11.2021 PASSED IN MVC NO. 4303/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XXI ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE 3 CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative is present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.8,90,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakh Ninety Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of 4 award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the Judgment and Award passed by the Claims Tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SRK