Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72690 (KAR)

SRI S L SUBRAYA SETTY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/6897/2024 · 2025-09-03

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35027 WP No. 6897 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 6897 OF 2024 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: SRI. S. L. SUBRAYA SETTY S/O LATE C Y LAKSHMINARAYANA SETTY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/A NO.471, BRAHMANARA BEEDI, SAKALESHPURA TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT-573134 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDAMALLAPPA P M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAND REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT, DISTRICT DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS BUILDING, HASSAN - 573201. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HASSAN SUB-DIVISION, DISTRICT DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS BUILDING, HASSAN - 573201. 4. THE TAHSILDAR SAKLAESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT SAKALESHPURA - 573 134. Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35027 WP No. 6897 of 2024 5. INSPECTOR POLICE, DCRB DIVISION, (CEN CRIME BRANCH) HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN - 573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.V.SESHU., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30.07.2022, PASSED IN CASE NO.LND/HEM.JA.YO.(DA):279/2014-15, BY THE R3, AS PER ANNEXURE-J AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved of the impugned order dated 30.07.2022 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Hemavathi Reservoir Project, Hassan, in case No.L.N.D/HE.JA.YO.(DA):279/2014-15 at Annexure-J. 2. The petitioner claims to be a legal representative of Late. C.Y.Lakshminarayana Shetty, who lost lands due to submergence of his lands under water on the construction of Hemavati/Yagachi/Vatehole Reservoir Project. In terms of the scheme proposed by the State - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35027 WP No. 6897 of 2024 Government, a person who lost land on account of submergence for the project, would not only be entitled for compensation but also entitled for grant of alternative lands to ensure that the livelihood of such agriculturists are not lost. Accordingly, 4.00 Acres of land in Block No.10 of Sy.No.55 of Chikkanduru Village, Yesaluru Hobli, Sakaleshapura Taluk was granted. However, several irregularities were found in the matter of allotment of alternative lands. Action was directed by the State Government having regard to such irregularities. The Special Land Acquisition Officer (for short ‘SLAO’) has passed the impugned order in respect of the grantee/ petitioner cancelling the grant. 3. Having regard to the ground on which the impugned order has been passed, it is clear that the SLAO has cancelled the grant on one of the following grounds: a) Grant was made to a person who had not lost any land in submergence; - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35027 WP No. 6897 of 2024 b) Bogus grant order has been created, although no such grant order was passed; c) Dual grant orders have been passed on the basis of one award passed by the SLAO; d) Such dual grant orders and fictitious grant orders have been passed during the tenure of Sri V.Srinivas Gowda or Sri B.A.Jagadeesh who were the then Special Land Acquisition Officers; e) Land granted is a forest land and not revenue lands and therefore it could not have been granted. 4. The factual information and the ground on which the impugned order of cancellation has been passed by the SLAO is identifiable as one of the grounds noticed hereinabove. Therefore, all other observations made in the impugned order are hereby set aside as not specifically applicable to the petitioner. It is also a fact that the impugned order of cancellation was passed without - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35027 WP No. 6897 of 2024 hearing the grantee and therefore, on the ground of denial of principles of natural justice alone, the impugned order of cancellation is required to be set aside. 5. Consequently, this Court proceeds to pass the following: ORDER i) Writ petition is allowed in part. ii) The impugned order dated 30.07.2022 in case No.L.N.D./HE.JA.YO.(DA): 279/ 2014-15 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Hemavathi Reservoir Project, Hassan, at Annexure-J, is hereby quashed and set aside. iii) The matter stands remanded back to the SLAO to reconsider the matter afresh after affording an opportunity of hearing to the grantee/petitioner. The petitioner is permitted to submit any material to defend the order of grant. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35027 WP No. 6897 of 2024 iv) Insofar as the cancellation orders passed on the ground that the land in question is a forest land and not revenue land and therefore, it could not have been granted, the SLAO is required to reconsider the matter after securing the opinion from the forest department as well as the Revenue department. If ultimately it is found that the land is a forest land, then alternative lands shall be granted to the grantee/petitioner. v) Consequent to the restoration of the grant in favour of the grantee/petitioner, the revenue entries shall also be restored in the RTC. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL