CRWP-69 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 112 Payal and another State of Punjab and Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 10, who are harassing in order to save their prestige in the society. 2. petitioners are major and unmarried. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 10. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated (Annexure P liberty. 3. 4. respondent-State. 6956-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH and another Versus State of Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Raman Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and unmarried. It is submitted that both the petitioners are ive-in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 . The petitioners have submitted a representation dated (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6956-2025 Decided on:03.07.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and unmarried. It is submitted that both the petitioners are in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 . The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 29.06.2025 3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and unmarried. It is submitted that both the petitioners are in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 .06.2025 3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.03 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-69 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2 Jalandhar, District the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, c This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live July 03, 2025 vinod* 6956-2025 Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police District Jalandhar, to decide the representation ( the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, c This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live-in relationship. July 03, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - ng upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Senior Superintendent of Police (Rural) , to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever in relationship. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge r Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES ng upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a (Rural), 3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the ommitted by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.03 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document