Nakul Shankarao Patil v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
CP/573/2025 · 2025-12-23
Shri Ajit B Kadethankar, Shri M S Karnik
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72676 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72676 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
911-573-2025-CP=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 573 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10363 OF 2024 Nakul Shankarao Patil … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. Chetan G. Patil a/w Ms. Siddheshwari R. Chavan, Prathamesh P. Magadum i/b Bhushan S. Jadhav for the Petitioner. Mr. Bhushan S. Jadhav for the Respondent - State. ………….
Coram : M. S. Karnik & Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ. Date : December 23, 2025.
P. C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Learned AGP has placed on record copy of the order dated 30th October 2025 passed by the Collector, Kolhapur. The copy of the said
order has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. We ind that there is substantial compliance of the order that is alleged to have been breached. Uday S. Jagtap 1 of
2 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2025.12.24 12:45:46 +0530
911-573-2025-CP=.doc
4. We are therefore not inclined to entertain the Writ Petition. Liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 30th October 2025 passed by the Collector, Kolhapur on merits, is kept open.
5. The Writ Petition is disposed of. [Ajit B. Kadethankar, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik, J. ] Uday S. Jagtap 2 of
2