A. No. 4741 of 2025 and C.S. No. 35 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA A. No. 4741 of 2025 and C.S. No. 35 of 2013 1.Indian Overseas Bank, R.K.Salai Branch Rep. by its Chief Manager No.32, R.K.Salai, Mylapore Chennai-600 004. 2.Indian Overseas Bank, Spencer Plaza Branch Rep. by its Chief Manager G-135H, 3.4 Phase, Spencer Plaza 769, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.Indian Overseas Bank, Aminjikarai Branch Rep. by its Chief Manager No.409, (Old No.248), Poonamallee High Road Aminjikarai, Chennai-600 029. ...Applicants Vs. 1.Dr.Kamakshi Memorial Hospital P. Ltd. No.1, Radial Road, Pallikaranai Chennai-600 100. 2.Dr.T.G.Govindarajan No.1, Radial Road, Pallikaranai Chennai-600 100. Page 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A. No. 4741 of 2025 and C.S. No. 35 of 2013 3. Dr.T.G.Sivaranjani No.6, Shandy Road, C.Pallavaram Chennai-600 043. 4.Dr.T.G.Bhariravi 6/17, 3rd Cross Street Kasthuribai Nagar, Adyar Chennai-600020. 5.S.Ganapathy Flat No.14, Gyan Apartment 38, Venkatraman Street, T.Nagar Chennai-600 017. 6.S.Venkatramani G.Pushpalata (died) 7.DSLV Ventures LLC 523, Green Tree Place Fairborn, Ohio 45324. 8.G.Nandhini ... Respondents Prayer : This application has been filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Section 5 of Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 2103 days in filing the set aside petition in the above application in C.S. No. 35 of 2013. For applicant : M/s.V.Rajeswari For Respondents : Mr.Shabeer Ali for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates ----- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A. No. 4741 of 2025 and C.S. No. 35 of 2013 This application has been filed by the defendants 5 to 7 to condone the delay of 2103 days in filing the set aside exparte order in the above application in C.S. No. 35 of 2013. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. During the last hearing, the matter had been adjourned, at the request of the learned counsel for the respondents to file counter. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, a counter has been filed by the respondents. 4. However, the only objection being raised by the learned counsel for the respondents is that the applicants having been served the summons on several occasions, he has chosen to remain absent and invited an exparte order. Now, they have come out with an application to condone the delay of 2103 days in filing to set aside the exparte order. Hence, the application should not be allowed. 5. No doubt, the delay is inordinate and the applicants have not chosen to take any immediate steps to set aside the exparte order after coming to know about the same. Even according to the applicants, they https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A. No. 4741 of 2025 and C.S. No. 35 of 2013 received copies of the applications in A. Nos. 6095, 6096 and 6097 of 2024 filed by the respondents /plaintiffs for various purposes in the above suit. 6. It is alleged that the applicants happened to see those applications only on 31.12.2025. The above contention of the applicants itself is false because 31.12.2025 is a future date. However, it might be a typographical error instead of 31.12.2024, it has been mentioned as 31.12.2025. Still, the applicants were not vigilant enough to file this application to set aside the exparte order immediately. 7. When the applicants had received the copies of the applications, it is difficult to believe that they have not received any summons in the suit or copies of the pleadings, if any. 8. The suit is still pending. To dispose the suit on merits would serve the purpose better than allowing the Court to pass an exparte decree or dismissal. 9. The inordinate delay made by the applicants without any valid reasons would definitely cause hardship and inconvenience to the respondents, who have filed the suit for recovery of huge suit amount. If https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A. No. 4741 of 2025 and C.S. No. 35 of 2013 really the applicants are interested to contest the suit seriously, they should bear the cost for causing the delay. So, I feel, it is appropriate to put the applicants on terms of payment of cost of Rs.6,000/- within a week. 10. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the cost of Rs.6000/- has been paid immediately and the said statement is also acknowledged by the respondents. 11. In view of the above reason, this application is allowed. No costs. 10.10.2025 Maya https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A. No. 4741 of 2025 and C.S. No. 35 of 2013 Dr. R.N.MANJULA, J. Maya A. No. 4741 of 2025 and C.S. No. 35 of 2013 Dated : 10.10.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis