GAJANAND MEENA v. MANOJ YADAV, DIRECTOR GENERAL RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE AND ORS.
CPAN/44/2025 · 2025-11-07
Raja Basu Chowdhury
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72646 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72646 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
06.11.2025 Ct. 3 Item No.
JPG 3 Saswata
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CPAN 44 of 2025 CAN 1 of 2025 in WPA 757 of 2021
Gajanand Meena Versus Manoj Yadav & Ors. Ms. Angana Rakshit … For the applicant Mr. Sudipto Mazumdar, Sr. Adv.,Ld. DSGI Mr. Ajay Kr. Singhania Ms. Kabita Ghosh … For the alleged contemnors
1. Mr. Mazumdar, learned senior advocate and DSGI assisted by Mr. Singhania, learned advocate appearing for the alleged contemnors submits that in compliance of the direction passed by the Hon’ble Appellate Court, the petitioner has since been reinstated vide order dated 23rd September
2025.
2. Having regard to the above, I find that nothing survives in the instant contempt application. Accordingly, the contempt application being CPAN 44 of 2025 along with its connected application being CAN 1 of 2025 is disposed of by recording the fact that the affidavit of compliance in original
2 has been filed by Mr. Singhania before the Circuit Bench of this Court at Jalpaiguri.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)