Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72645 (CAL)

NABANITA SARKAR v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

WPA/2025/2025 · 2025-10-31

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 2 (1545) 31.10.2025 (JPD 44) (S. Banerjee) Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Side WPA 2025 of 2025 Nabanita Sarkar Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Madhushri Dutta Mr. Sourav Mandal … for the petitioner Mr. Subir Kumar Saha Mr. Sandip Guha Roy … for the State The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the submission made by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. The State is represented by its learned advocates. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)