NABANITA SARKAR v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
WPA/2025/2025 · 2025-10-31
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72645 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72645 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. 2 (1545)
31.10.2025
(JPD 44)
(S. Banerjee) Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Side
WPA 2025 of 2025
Nabanita Sarkar Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Madhushri Dutta Mr. Sourav Mandal … for the petitioner Mr. Subir Kumar Saha Mr. Sandip Guha Roy … for the State
The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the submission made by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. The State is represented by its learned advocates.
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)