Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7264 (RAJ)

MADAN LAL AND ORS v. GHASI LAL AND ORS

CSA/401/2001 · 2025-04-17

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 401/2001 1. Madan Lal S/o Gopal Meena 2. Sarwan Lal (Since Deceased) through his legal heirs 2/1. 2/2. 2/3. 2/4. 3. Ram Dayal S/o Sarwan Lal Hem Raj S/o Late Sh. Sarwan Lal. Nand Kishore S/o Late Shri Sarwan Lal. Smt.Mathuri Bai W/o Late Shri Sarwan Lal. Ram Dayal S/o Sarwan Lal (Already At S.no. 2/1) All residents of Merma Talab, Tehsil Atru, Distt. Baran ---Deceased-Appellants Versus 1. Ghasi Lal S/o Jagannath Meena, 2. Goura, W/o Jagan Nath Meena, 3. Ram Dayal S/o Mathura Lal Meena, 4. Chhote Lal, S/o Bishan Lal Meena, 5. 5/1. Chhetar Lal Since Deceased, Ram Karan S/o Late Shri Chhetar Lal, 5/2. Prahlad S/o Late Shri Chhetar Lal 5/3. Mukesh S/o Late Shri Chhetar Lal 5/4. Gulab Devi Widow of Cheetar Lal. All R/o Boredi, Distt. Baran ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. J. K. Singhvi, Senior Adv. assisted by Mr. Tarun Verma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Banwari Lal Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 17/04/2025 Matter comes up on an application (I.A.1/2025) for disposal of the appeal on the basis of compromise arrived between the parties. (2 of 2) [CSA-401/2001] Learned senior counsel for the appellants submits that both the parties have entered into a compromise and on account of compromise, he wants to withdraw this appeal. In this regard, he has annexed the original compromise with the application as Annexure-A. In view of the above, the civil second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The original compromise be treated as an integral part of this order. Decree be drawn accordingly. Application(I.A. No.01/2025) stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s), disposed of. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Gourav/29