SMT. ANDEELA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/21564/2025 · 2025-09-22
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72634 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72634 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 21564 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondent no.2 shall looked and enquired the matter on the application dated 16.06.2025 given by the petitioners regarding no any construction shall be made on Gata No.217m purchased by the petitioners area 31 Discimal from one Praveen Singh. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondents shall stop the constructions during pendency of the writ petition No. 3610 of 2014 before this Hon'ble Court filed by the respondent no.5."
3. The grievance of the petitioners is that they have purchased the land in question through a registered sale deed dated 27.07.2022, but despite having title over the said land, respondent nos. 4 and 5 are interfering in their possession and are obstructing construction over the said land on the pretext that some order has been passed by this Court.
4. Be that as it may, the dispute is essentially private dispute between the petitioners and respondent nos. 4 and 5 who are the private parties. This Court, while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot issue directions against private parties unless there is an element of public law involved. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajitabh Choubey, C.S.C. Smt. Andeela Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy available under law. September 23, 2025 Gaurav WRIC No. 21564 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad