Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7263 (KAR)

KAVITA W/O KIRAN KULKARNI v. SHRI SIDDAPPA S/O KAREPPA ALKANUR

CRL.P/103650/2022 · 2025-02-07

Hemant Chandangoudar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2463 CRL.P No. 103650 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103650 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: KAVITA W/O. KIRAN KULKARNI AGE. 41 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. C/O. JAYARAO G PATIL, NEAR BERKI HANUMAN TEMPLE, HALKERI GALLI, ZENDA KATTI, VIJAYAPUR-583101, TQ. AND DIST. VIJAYPUR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ARUN L. NEELOPANT, ADVOCATE) AND: SHRI. SIDDAPPA S/O. KAREPPA ALKANUR AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. YARAGATTI -587314, TAL. RABAKAVI, DIST. BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S.C.BHUTI, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO, QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE I ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT JAMKHANDI PASSED IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 5050/2021 DATED 05.08.2022 AS PER ANNEXURE-A; AND QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFX, BANAHATTI IN CC NO. 426/2021 (PCR NO. 145/2020) DATED 15.12.2020 TAKING COGNIZANCE AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NI ACT AS PER ANNEXURE-B; ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO THE TRIAL COURT TO DROP THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AS AGAINST THE PRESENT PETITIONER IN CC NO. 426/2021 (PCR NO. 145/2020) ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANAHATTI FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NI ACT. B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.02.11 15:51:53 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2463 CRL.P No. 103650 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition, stating that, the relief sought for in this petition does not survive for consideration. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE HR Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 105