Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72619 (PNJ)

ARJUN ALIAS AMAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/33970/2025 · 2025-07-03

Namit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 121 CRM-M-33970-2025 Date of decision : 03.07.2025 Arjun Alias Aman and another ….Petitioners V/S State of Haryana and another ….Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Manoj Chahal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, D.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Dharamvir Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** NAMIT KUMAR , J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.248 dated 12.06.2023 registered under Sections 323, 354-A, 506 & 509 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Chandimandir, Panchkula and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 11.01.2025 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Vikas Kumar, submits that after registration of FIR, Section 354-A of IPC was deleted and thereafter, Sections 201 & 452 of IPC were added. She further submits that the mother of the complainant, who is also a victim, has not been impleaded as a party-respondent in the present petition. 3. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 03.07.2025 (NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No Vinod Kothiyal 2025.07.03 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document