HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 14642 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State- respondents and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that investigation in the instant case has already been concluded and charge-sheet has also been submitted against the accused-respondents and as such, he does not want to press the instant petition and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Learned A.G.A. for the State could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view thereof, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. September 16, 2025 Sachin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Pandey, Upendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Sarafraj Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad