KUBER SINGH SISODIYA S/O SHRI LALLULAL SISODIYA v. MANNALAL MALI S/O SHRI RADHEYSHYAM MALI
CMA/842/2025 · 2025-02-27
Ashutosh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7259 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7259 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:8661] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 842/2025 Kuber Singh Sisodiya S/o Shri Lallulal Sisodiya, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Plot No.9, Ganesh Nagar, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Appellant Versus
1. Mannalal Mali S/o Shri Radheyshyam Mali, R/o Teeba Wali Dhani, Village Vatika, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Gaurav Singh S/o Shri Vishnu Singh, R/o 2750, Purviyo Ka Mohalla, Khajane Walo Ka Rasta, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Mahesh Meena S/o Shri Nenuram Meena, R/o Ram Nangal Puran, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur (Raj.)
4. Rajendra Kumar Choudhary S/o Late Shri Badrinarayan Choudhary, R/o Badapadampura, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur (Raj.)
5. Babulal Choudhary S/o Shri Kailash Choudhary, R/o Harnath Baba Ki Dhani, Jotadawala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.)
6. Sub-Registrar Sanganer, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur.
7. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Prahlad Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order 27/02/2025
1. This civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed against the
order dated 21.12.2024 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No.11 Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Headquarter Sanganer in Civil Miscellaneous Case No.307/2024 titled as
[2025:RJ-JP:8661] (2 of 2) [CMA-842/2025] Mannalal Mali Vs. Kuber Singh Sisodiya & Ors., by which an interim relief in the application for temporary injunction filed by the plaintiff/respondent no.1 has been allowed and the appellant who is the defendant before the trial Court, has been enjoined not to alienate the suit property till the filing of reply to the temporary injunction application.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has filed the reply to the temporary injunction application, but the learned trial Court is adjourning the case unnecessarily. Therefore, the learned trial Court be directed to dispose of the matter in a time bound period.
3. The direction to the trial Court to dispose of the matter in a time bound manner cannot be given without knowing the fact that as how many new cases and how many old cases are pending before the learned trial Court, however, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned trial Court is directed to dispose of the Civil Miscellaneous Case No. 307/2024 at the earliest, as the appellant has filed reply to the application.
4. The appellant is given liberty to file appropriate application before the learned trial Court for disposing of the matter at an early stage.
5. With the above directions, this civil miscellaneous appeal is
disposed of.
6. The stay application also stands disposed of.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /25