Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010027002024 2025:GAU-AS:1323 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/507/2024 ON THE DEATH OF MANORANJAN RAY HIS LEGAL HEIRS SABITRI RAY AND ORS S/O LATE JITENDRA CH. RAY, R/O SALBAGAN, NORTH BONGAIGAON, WARD NO. 9, P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM. 1.1: SMTI SABITRI RAY W/O LATE MANORANJAN RAY R/O SALBAGAN NORTH BONGAIGAON WARD NO.9 P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM 1.2: ANKUR RAY S/O LATE MANORANJAN RAY R/O SALBAGAN NORTH BONGAIGAON WARD NO.9 P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM 1.3: ABHIJIT RAY S/O LATE MANORANJAN RAY R/O SALBAGAN NORTH BONGAIGAON WARD NO.9 P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM 1.4: MANOJ RAY S/O LATE MANORANJAN RAY R/O SALBAGAN Page No.# 2/3 NORTH BONGAIGAON WARD NO.9 P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSA VERSUS SMTI USHA RANI RAY AND 3 ORS W/O LATE JITENDRA CH. RAY, R/O SALBAGAN, NORTH BONGAIGAON, WARD NO. 9, P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON 788801 2:JAWAHAR RAY S/O LATE JITENDRA CH. RAY R/O SHASTRI ROAD NEAR BIDYA BHABAN L.P. SCHOOL NORTH BONGAIGAON SALBAGAN MUNICIPALITY P.O. P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM 788801 3:SITAL RAY S/O LATE JITENDRA CH. RAY R/O NEAR SHANTIDHAM KALIBARI PVT. HOUSE OF RLY NEW COLONY P.O. P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM 4:MILAN RAY S/O LATE JITENDRA CH. RAY R/O SALBAGAN NORTH BONGAIGAON WARD NO. 9 BONGAIGAON MUNICIPALITY P.O. P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM 78880 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SISHIR DUTTA, MR. SIDHANT DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : MR A ALOM, MR. M ALAMGEER Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER Date : 10.02.2025 Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the applicant has filed an instant applicant for condoning the delay of 617 days in filing the application for substitution. The learned counsel submits that the delay of 617 days has been explained at page 4 to 6 of the applicantion. Mr. M. Alamgeer, learned counsel for the respondents is present, who submits that he has no objection to the I.A. Since, no objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the respondents, the Court allowed the delay of 617 days in filing the substitution application, on being satisfied with the explanation given at paragraphs 4 to 6 of the I.A which is not due to any laches or negligence. Accordingly, the I.A./507/2024 stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant