HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 21510 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:- "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to take appropriate legal action against respondent no.4 after a detailed enquiry in the matter regarding threat to the petitioners in their business functioning and also to ensure the smooth execution of agreement between the petitioners and Smt. Anita Singh regarding the advance payment made by the petitioners for purchasing the land; (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 and 3 to decide the complaint/representation of the petitioners dated 12.06.2025 by a reasoned and speaking order after holding a proper enquiry within a short stipulated period, which this Hon'ble Court thinks fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (c) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. (d) Award cost of the petition to the petitioners." 3. The grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners are engaged in real estate business. The petitioners have purchased a land but the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Upendra Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sanjay Kumar Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) respondent No.4 who is alleged to be Bhu Mafia is restraining the petitioners from executing the sale deed. 4. The dispute is essentially a private dispute between the petitioners and the respondent No.4 and being a private dispute, this Court cannot issue a direction to a private person. 5. If the respondent No.4 is threatening the petitioners, the petitioners have other appropriate remedy under law and the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not appropriate remedy for the aforesaid reliefs prayed for. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy available under law. September 24, 2025 SS WRIC No. 21510 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad