Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7258 (HP)

SALOCHANA v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/3408/2025 · 2025-04-09

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.3402 of 2025 and connected matters Decided on: 09.04. 2025 _________________________________________________________________ 1. CWP No. 3402 of 2025 Nagesh Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 2. CWP No. 3408 of 2025 Salochana ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 3. CWP No. 3192 of 2025 Bhuvneshwari ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents ____________________________________________________________ 4. CWP No. 3202 of 2025 Neelam ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ - 2 - 5. CWP No. 3490 of 2025 Lata Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Pankaj Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to developments that have taken place post the filing of these writ petitions, more specifically the enactment, i.e. The Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024, these writ petitions in the present form, cannot proceed ahead, therefore, the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law, inter alia, 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 3 - assailing the aforesaid enactment. 2. Prayer is accepted. Granting such liberty, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge April 9, 2025 R.Atal