Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72572 (KAR)

MANSOOR ALI KHAN v. MOHAMMED MOUSEEN

RPFC/116/2020 · 2025-07-21

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27442 RPFC No. 116 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 116 OF 2020 BETWEEN: MANSOOR ALI KHAN S/O LATE SARDAR M M ALI KHAN AGED 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.708 3RD CROSS, GANDHINAGAR MYSURU-570 007. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMMED SALEHA @ MUKARRAM, ADVOCATE) AND: MOHAMMED MOUSEEN S/O MANSOOR ALI KHAN AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT REMEEZA KHANAM RESIDING AT NO.3933, 2ND CROSS ANNAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, GANDHINAGAR MYSURU-570 007. …RESPONDENT THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.01.2020 PASSED IN C.MISC.No. 254/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27442 RPFC No. 116 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition stating that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the petition. Memo is taken on record. 2. Accordingly, the RPFC petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. All I.As., in the RPFC petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 140