Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72568 (KAR)

SMT JAYASHREE v. SRI NARESH KUMAR

RPFC/105/2020 · 2025-07-21

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28550 RPFC No. 105 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 105 OF 2020 BETWEEN: SMT. JAYASHREE W/O SRI. NARESH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. R/AT NO.1071, 1ST MAIN, GALPETE, KOLAR-563 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.R. VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SRI. NARESH KUMAR S/O SRI. CHIDANANDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT AMBABHAVANI NILAYA, NEAR VANI VIDYALAYA SCHOOL, NETHAJI NAGAR, BELLARY-583 104. …RESPONDENT THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT / ORDER DATED 06.11.2019 IN CRL.MISC.(F.C.) NO.151/2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED JUDGE OF THE PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT, KOLAR, CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDNT TO PAY A SUM OF RS.20,000/- PER MONTH TOWARDS HER MAINTENANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28550 RPFC No. 105 of 2020 ORAL ORDER The RPFC is of the year 2020. Till now, no steps are taken for issuance of notice to the respondent. 2. When the matter was listed on 18.7.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of both the parties and no notice is served on the respondent, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for 'dismissal' today. 3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17