Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72553 (BOM)

PRASAD DEVENDRA GONJARI AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

APL/330/2022 · 2025-12-19

Shri Ajit B Kadethankar, Shri M S Karnik

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

921 Apl-330-2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 330 OF 2022 Prasad Devendra Gonjari and Others. ...Applicants. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Another. ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Sarang S. Aradhye (thr. V.C.), Shantanu Gurav, Gouri Velankar for Applicants. Ms. Sonali Chavan for the Respondent No. 2. Mr. A. A.Naik, APP for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram : M. S. Karnik & Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ. Date : December 19, 2025. P. C. : 1. Learned Counsel for the parties submitted that during the pendency of aforesaid Criminal Application, parties have arrived at amicable settlement and decided to put an end to all disputes. The Respondent No.2 has iled an aidavit giving consent and “No- Objection” for quashing the subject FIR bearing C.R. No. 90 of 2021 registered at Dhebewadi Police Station for the ofences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506 read with 34 of IPC. 2. The Respondent No.2 (original complainant) is present in Court and is identiied by the advocate on record for the Respondent No. 2. 3. Aidavit iled by the Respondent No. 2 records that parties have decided to settle all issues between them and have agreed to apply for Patil-SR 1 of 2 921 Apl-330-2022.doc divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and have arrived at consent terms for full and inal settlement. 4. Aidavits of the parties are taken on record and marked “X” for identiication. Consent terms between the Applicant No.1 and Respondent No. 2 are duly signed by parties as well as by their respective advocates. The same are taken on record and marked “X-1” for identiication. 5. In such view of the matter, continuing the criminal prosecution of Applicants will only add to the agony of parties. No fruitful purpose will be served by keeping the proceedings pending. Dispute is purely a matrimonial dispute. 6. In the circumstances, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (a-1), which read thus : “(a) That by appropriate orders as well as directions of this Hon'ble Court, the irst information report (FIR) registered against the Petitioners at the behest of the Respondent No.2/Original informant at Pandharpur City police station being CR No. 90 of 2021 Dated 30/11/2021 under sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, be quashed and set aside; (a-1) That by appropriate Orders as well as directions of this Hon'ble Court the Charge-Sheet iled against the Applicants at Dhebewadi Police Station dated 28/01/2022 in C. R. No. 90 of 2021 registered with Dhebewadi Police Station, for ofences punishable under Section 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, be quashed and set aside” 7. Application stands disposed of. [Ajit B. Kadethankar, J.] [M. S. Karnik, J.] Patil-SR 2 of 2