Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7254 (MAD)

S.Nagarajan v. K.Chidambaram

WA(MD)/2392/2025 · 2026-06-12

D Bharatha Chakravarthy, N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.A.(MD)No.2392 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.(MD)No.2392 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.13446 of 2025 1.S.Nagarajan 2.V.Ramkumar 3.S.Arivumani 4.C.Balakrishnan 5.R.Viswananthan 6.Ashok Kumar 7.V.Kumar 8.S.Kalyanasundaram 9.R.Perumalswamy 10.P.Ramakrishnan 11.S.Ramkumar 12.D.Selvam ...Appellants Vs. 1.K.Chidambaram 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary to Government, Home Department, Chennai. 3.The Director General of Police, Mylapore Chennai-9. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.2392 of 2025 4.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner Office of Police Campus, Egmore, Chennai-8. 5.The Additional Director General of Police, (Armed Police) Head Quarters, Kilpauk, Chennai-10. 6.The Inspector General of Police, Trichy Range, Armed Police Head Quareters, Kilpauk, Chennai. 7.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Armed Police Head Quarters, Chennai-10. 8.The Commandant, TSP-6th Battalion, Reserve Line, Madurai-14. ...Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Appeal – filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.16111 of 2025 dated 18.06.2025. For Appellants : Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Zamil (R1) for M/s.Ajmal Associates Mr.M.S.Parthiban (R2 & R4) Counsel for the State Mr.I.Murugesan (RR3, 5 to 8) Government Advocate (Crl.side) 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.2392 of 2025 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) This writ appeal is directed against the order passed in W.P. (MD)No.16111 of 2025 dated 18.06.2025, which was filed seeking to fix the proper seniority to the petitioner. 2.Perusal of the order impugned in this writ appeal shows that the learned Single Judge without going into the merits of the matter had merely directed the competent authority to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 19.05.2025 after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other interested persons. Therefore, no prejudice is caused to the appellant. 3.Hence, we do not find any merits in this appeal warranting interference with the order of the learned Single Judge. The authorities, before passing any order on the representation, shall give an opportunity of hearing to the appellant. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.2392 of 2025 4.With the above direction, this writ petition stands dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. [N.S.K., J.] & [D.B.C., J.] 12.06.2026 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes ta To 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary to Government, Home Department, Chennai. 2.The Director General of Police, Mylapore Chennai-9. 3.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board, Old Commissioner Office of Police Campus, Egmore, Chennai-8. 4.The Additional Director General of Police, (Armed Police) Head Quarters, Kilpauk, Chennai-10. 5.The Inspector General of Police, Trichy Range, Armed Police Head Quareters, Kilpauk, Chennai. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.2392 of 2025 6.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Armed Police Head Quarters, Chennai-10. 7.The Commandant, TSP-6th Battalion, Reserve Line, Madurai-14. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.2392 of 2025 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. ta W.A.(MD)No.2392 of 2025 12.06.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis