VIRENDRA VIKARAM PRATAP v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/9603/2025 · 2025-07-14
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72524 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72524 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115454 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9603 of 2025 Petitioner :- Virendra Vikaram Pratap Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Tej Bhan Singh Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Anurag Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Tej Bhan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2&3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondent nos.2&3 to pay the gratuity to the petitioner. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents as well as counsel for the respondent nos.2&3 submits that his claim has already been decided by the concerned official and information about the same has already been given to him as is evident from Page 17 of the writ petition. In view of the above, when the Court was dismissing the petition, leaned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw this petition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad