Wp-10390-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10390 OF 2025 Anil Digambar Mohite. ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others. ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Dhananjay Chavan for the Petitioner. Mr. R. P. Kadam, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram : M. S. Karnik & Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ. Date : December 19, 2025. P. C. : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has placed on record a chart giving details of service of the Petitioner and as also the details regarding proceedings before the Industrial Court. The relevant portion of the said chart reads thus : Date Particulars / events / reference. 16-1-1986 to 31-3-1989 Petitioner was working as Muster Assistant in the oice of Respondent No.9. 31-3-1989 Petitioner was orally terminated. 1991 Since the petitioner was orally terminated, he approached Labour Court/Industrial Court through Ref. IDA No.203/1991. 11-6-1998. The Labour Court by allowed the Ref. & the Hon'ble Court directed to Respondent to continue the service of petitioner with backwages. Patil-SR 1 of 2 Wp-10390-2025.doc 10-2-1999 The Respondent No.8 reinstated the Petitioner in service. 31-5-2021 The Petitioner retired from service of oice of the Respondent No. 11. The Petitioner submitted application/ representation seeking pensionary beneits to the Government authorities. 12-10-2018 The Hon'ble Bombay High Court by his order dated passed in Writ Petition No.8908 of 2015 & thereby the Hon'ble High Court directed to respondents to absorb them in Government Service from the date of illing of reference/complaint in Labour Court/Industrial Court. The Hon'ble Court also directed to grant pensionary beneits etc. The order passed by Hon'ble High Court is conirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. 3. Learned AGP opposed the petition by submitting that Government Resolution based on which the relief is sought by Petitioner does not cover the case of Petitioner. 4. We have carefully perused the order dated 30th March 2023 passed by this Court in Aba Shankar Jadhav v. The Secretary, Planning Department [Writ Petition No.13819 of 2017]. We are more than satisied that the aforesaid decision squarely covers the Petitioner’s case. 5. In this view of the matter, the Petitioner shall be considered as permanent from 31st March 1997 and pensionary beneits shall be granted to him considering his service with efect from 31st March 1997, as expeditiously as possible. 6. Writ petition stands disposed of with aforesaid directions. [Ajit B. Kadethankar, J.] [M. S. Karnik, J.] Patil-SR 2 of 2