- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51510 RP No. 498 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REVIEW PETITION NO. 498 OF 2025 BETWEEN: S.MUNISWAMY, S/O.LATE SADAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO. 180, BELATHUR COLONY, BELATHUR, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK - 560 067. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BIPIN HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPT. OF REVENUE REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.S. BLDG., DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DY.COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, CHAPPARADAKALLU, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 3. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 129. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51510 RP No. 498 of 2025 4. THE TAHSILDAR, HOSAKOTE, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 129. 5. B. NARAYANASWAMY, S/O. LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT GORAVIKERE VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANITHA N. GIRISH, HCGP) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION.114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 22.08.2025, PASSED IN WP 1390/23 ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 5 HEREIN AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE W.P.1390/2023, BY ALLOWING THIS REVIEW PETITION.THE ABOVE PETITION CAME UP FOR FURTHER DICTATION, ON 22.08.2025 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI AND THE PETITION WAS ALLOWED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER This Review Petition is filed challenging order dated 22.08.2025 passed in W.P.no.1390/2023. 2. Though it is submitted that at time of passing order, order was passed on an incorrect submission by counsel for petitioner that Tahsildar had order re-grant of Sy.no.402 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51510 RP No. 498 of 2025 measuring 5 acres 3 guntas including 2 guntas of kharab land situated at Amanidoddakeri village, Kasaba Hobli, Hosakote Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District, in favour of Chikkamuniyappa, order clearly stated that Chikkamuniyappa was entitled for re- grant in other survey numbers to extent of 1/5th share, except Sy.no.402 of Amanidoddakeri village, and therefore, seeks for allowing Review Petition and restore Writ Petition to file. 3. It is seen that petitioner herein had entered appearance, but counsel had remained absent. 4. This Court took note of pleadings and contentions urged by learned counsel for petitioner and passed order impugned. There does not appear any error apparent on face of record to entertain Review Petition. Apart from above, impugned order is appealable. Hence, Review Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15