Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72510 (ALL)

VISHAL AGRAWAL v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/6379/2024 · 2025-03-04

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:31645 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6379 of 2024 Applicant :- Vishal Agrawal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- A.K. Mishra,Sati Shanker Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rohit Shukla Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. By order dated 26.07.20024, matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Allahabad. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties appeared before Mediation & Conciliation Centre but the matter could not be materialized. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rohit Shukla, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.121 of 2024, under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Jamunapar, District- Mathura. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant. 6. Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused. 7. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrenders before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922. 8. For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him. 9. With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 5.3.2025 SKD Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad