Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72494 (KAR)

SRI.A.SHIVAKUMAR, v. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR

WP/2901/2023 · 2025-12-08

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51721 WP No. 2901 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 2901 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.A.SHIVAKUMAR S/O ANNAPPA. P. AGED 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHIKKAGOLLARAHATTI, LAKSHMIPURA, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009. 2. THE TAHSILDAR , BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER , BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE - 560 009 … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51721 WP No. 2901 of 2023 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN APPEALS NO.738/2018, NO.739/2018 AND NO.740/2018 DATED 28/08/2020 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A2, A3 AND A4 AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER The office objections were notified in the month of February 2023. The office objections raised include the non-payment of court-fee. Despite several opportunities being granted, the office objection has not been complied with. 2. Today when the matter was called out in the morning session, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Taking note that this matter is of the year 2023 and neither court-fee is paid nor learned counsel for the petitioner is present before the Court when the matter is - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51721 WP No. 2901 of 2023 called out, it is clear that petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the proceedings. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR