2025:UHC:4546 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/926/2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Vinod Sharma and Mr. Kamlesh Budhlakoti, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Present applicant Raghav Anand, S/o Rajkumar Anand is praying for regular bail in relation to FIR dated 23.03.2025 registered as FIR No. 122 of 2025 wherein the present applicant and one Urmila are implicated for the offences punishable under Section 308(2), 61(5) of BNS 2023 read with Section 67 of the IT Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and only with an intention to blackmail the applicant, the applicant has been implicated. He further submits that the complainant is aged lady having two sons and there is major age difference in between the complainant and the applicant of about 8 years and furthermore in this FIR the complainant also implicated her step mother. 5. Apart from this, he submits that the charge sheet has already been filed and, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant and furthermore, the applicant has no previous criminal history. 6. On the other side, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. has not disputed this fact that the charge sheet has already been filed, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant and he has also not disputed this fact that the applicant has no previous criminal history. 7. After hearing the arguments of the 2025:UHC:4546 learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the applicant has no previous criminal history and the charge sheet has already been filed, as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant Raghav Anand be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 04.06.2025 Parul