ROHIT KUMAR SINGH AND 4 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/9138/2025 · 2025-07-08
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72484 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72484 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:108456 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9138 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rohit Kumar Singh And 4 Others Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Srivastava,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:-
" (a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents-Authorities to consider case of the Petitioners and also pass appropriate order for transferring the Petitioners in any of the institutions as desired and duly filled up in their online applications/ online transfer request. (b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents-Authorities to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 19.6.2025 pending before them within some stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri Saurabh, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Heard Sri R. K. Ojha, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Sri D. K. Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri Saurabh, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners as no objection made by learned standing counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 The Director of Education (M), U.P., Lucknow within a week. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 9.7.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad