135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6935-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 02.07.2025 SUNITA AND ANOTHER .......PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Chirag Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate the petitioner(s). Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG, Haryana. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(Oral) This Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the petitioners. Learned State Counsel has submitted that a speaking order has already been passed in the complaint dated 27.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) by the authorities concerned and has produced the copy of the same along with the statement of petitioner No.1, which is taken on record. He has furnished a copy of the order to counsel for the petitioners. Anuradha 2025.07.03 05:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6935-2025 (O&M) 2 As per the statement of petitioner No. 1, she is living happily with her husband and now there is no threat perception, hence, they do not want any protection. In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to press this petition further. The petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure, in the light of notification No.12/252/2023-4HG-IV dated 17.02.2025 issued by the Home Department, Government of Haryana. Petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 02.07.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Anuradha 2025.07.03 05:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document