Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121654-DB Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21755 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neha Narang And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Singh,Birendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Arindam Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, petitioner no.1 was added respondent in Writ-C no.15328 of 2025 disposed of on order dated 15th May, 2025 by a Bench in which one of us (Arindam Sinha,J.) was party. He refers to paragraph 5 in the order and submits, his client was to be noticed for purpose of considering the representation and taking decision. Impugned is order dated 23rd June, 2025 made by respondent no.4, who was respondent no.2 in the earlier writ petition. His client was not noticed and therefore not heard in making of impugned order. He seeks interference. 2. Mr. Sharad Chandra Upadhyay, learned advocate, Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State. He submits, impugned order relates to an entirely different case. 3. Paragraphs 5 and 6 from said order dated 15th May, 2025 are reproduced below. "5. We are not inclined to direct issuance of notice on respondent no.2. Instead, said respondent is directed to consider petitioner's application dated 30th April, 2025. Petitioner will communicate certified copy of this order and the representation to said respondent. For purpose of consideration, said respondent will require assistance from petitioner and added respondent no.3. 6. Our impression is, said respondent will be able to resolve the dispute regarding issuance of the licence and all matters incidental thereto." 4. It appears from impugned order there is reference to said order dated 15th May, 2025. However, no notice was issued to petitioner no.1 (added respondent no.3 in the earlier writ petition). At this stage Mr. Upadhyay submits, matter be restored to respondent no.4. 5. In view of submission made on behalf of State, there is no necessity to direct issuance of notice on respondent no.4. Impugned order is set aside. Said respondent will consider afresh upon giving notice to petitioner no.1 and all others concerned. 6. The writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Shahroz (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad