- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32778 RSA No. 784 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 784 OF 2025 (RES) BETWEEN: B A RAJESH BABU S/O LATE B. A. ADINARAYAN GUPTA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCCP : BUSINESS R/O RAJESH TRADERS, OPP. VINODA TALKIES NOW METRO WHOLE SALE, TUMAKURU-572101. …APPELLANT (BY SRI S V PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: K K SANJAYA S/O. LATE K. KUMARESAN, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. No.7, ISMAIL STREET, OLD PET, KRISHNAGIRI, TAMILNADU-635001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI RAMESH K R, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.02.2025 PASSED IN R.A.No.120/2024 ON THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMAKURU., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.08.2024 PASSED IN O.S.No.177/2018 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMAKURU. Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32778 RSA No. 784 of 2025 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments for sometime, counsel for the appellant files a memo under the signature of the appellant. 2. All that the appellant seeking is time to vacate the premises voluntarily till 30.06.2026. 3. Counsel for the contesting respond has endorsed no objection on the memo. 4. Accordingly, the following: ORDER (i) Placing the memo on record, appeal stands allowed partly. (ii) Office is directed to pass the modified decree in terms of the memo filed by the counsel for appellant by appending the copy of the memo as part of the decree. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR