- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52452 WP No. 16123 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 16123 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. JAYARAM B.H S/O LATE B.H. HUNNAHALAGE GOWDA, AGE 59 YEARS, 2. SMT. MEENAKSHI M.K, W/O JAYARAM B.H. AGE 48 YEARS, PETITIONERS NO.1 AND 2 ARE RESIDING AT SRI VEERABHADRESHWARA KRUPA, 5TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR EAST, TUMKUR - 572 103. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N SURESHA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. CITY UNION BANK LTD., NO. 24-B, GANDHI NAGAR, KUMBAKONAM- 612 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER/ AUTHORIZED OFFICER. 2. MR. UMESH R S/O RUDRAPPA, AGE 40 YEARS, SHARADA SAPTHAGIRI LAYOUT, Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52452 WP No. 16123 of 2024 BEHIND MUKHTHAMVA COLONY, GEDDALAHALLI MAIN ROAD, TUMKUR - 572 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. KIRAN SAI NARYAN, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) QUASH THE SALE NOTICE DATED 24.05.2024 VIDE NO. C.O/REC/NPA/2024-25 ANNEXURE-B, ISSUED BY SENIOR MANAGER/AUTHORISED OFFICER AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed questioning the sale notice dated 24.05.2024 and also seeking a direction to the respondent to regularise the loan account. 2. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, by order dated 25.06.2024, restrained the Bank from confirming the auction sale conducted on 18.06.2024 till the next date of hearing, subject to the petitioners depositing a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- with the respondent/Bank on or before 27.07.2024. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52452 WP No. 16123 of 2024 3. Thereafter, this matter was listed on several occasions before this Court. When the matter came up on 09.12.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioners have not complied with the interim order passed by this Court. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3