MR. SACHIN RAJARAM ADAT v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
WP/13865/2022 · 2025-12-08
Shri Ajit B Kadethankar, Shri M S Karnik
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72447 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72447 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
49-13865-2022-CWP=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13865 OF 2022 Sachin Rajaram Adat … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. Ajay Joshi (through VC) for the Petitioner. Ms. T.J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondent - State. ………….
Coram : M. S. Karnik & Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ. Date : December 08, 2025.
P. C. :
1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
2. The present petition can be disposed of by directing the respondent No.3 – Education Oicer (Secondary) to decide the proposal which is at page 35, dated 26th October 2015, which was preceded by earlier proposal dated 28th September 2013 at page 30 of the paper book, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within 12 weeks from the date of communication of this order. Uday S. Jagtap 1 of
2 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2025.12.09 20:07:25 +0530
49-13865-2022-CWP=.doc
3. Deiciencies, if any, be communicated by the respondent No.3 to the management within 2 weeks from the communication of this order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by communication dated 30th September 2013 the management has cured all the deiciencies.
4. The Writ Petition is disposed of. [Ajit B. Kadethankar, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik ] Uday S. Jagtap 2 of
2