Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72444 (KAR)

SRI. HANUMAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/29897/2025 · 2025-10-30

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43466 WP No. 29897 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 29897 OF 2025 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: SRI. HANUMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, S/O VENKATAPPA, VISHWANATHAPURA VILLAGE, DODDRAMANAHALLI, KOLAR, BELAMARANAHALI, KOLAR - 563133. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NATARAJA BALLAL A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION, DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562110, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561203. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43466 WP No. 29897 of 2025 4. TASHILDAR, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DIST-562114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED 09/08/2007 AND 24/11/2008 (ANNEXURES-A AND E) AND REGULARIZE THE UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION AND ISSUE SAGUVALI CHIT IN A TIME BOUND MANNER IN RESPECT OF THE LAND IN S.NO.2 OF NANDAGUDI HOBLI, DODDARAMANAHALLI GRAMA, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT TO AN EXTENT OF 2 ACRES. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43466 WP No. 29897 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner by considering the representation at Annexures-A and E and to regularize the unauthorised occupation and issue Saguvali Chit in respect of the land in Sy.No.2 of Nandagudi Hobli, Doddaramanahalli grama, Hosakote Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that being in unauthorised occupation, petitioner has made an application for regularisation. It is further submitted that till date the respondent authorities have not taken any action nor any decision has been communicated to them. 4. In light of the limited prayer made, respondent No.4 to examine the relevant facts and material on record - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43466 WP No. 29897 of 2025 and pass appropriate orders after considering the application. Decision to be taken within a period not later than one year. It is made clear that the procedure under Rule 108-CCC of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966, is to be strictly complied with. 5. In terms of the amendment of the Rule 108-CCC (3), in the event of ineligibility, the Deputy Commissioner is the authority, who is to take a decision of rejection in the case of ineligible applications and the Tahsildar along with the report to forward the same to the Deputy Commissioner. If however, application is found eligible, then the Tahsildar is required to place it before the Regularisation Committee. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE MCR