IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 120 CRM-M-33940-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.07.2025. Tarsem Singh @ Tarsem Singh Sran ...Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Geeteshwar Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS is for issuance of directions to the official respondents to look in to the matter of the petitioner, in pursuance of representation dated 04.06.2025 and take appropriate legal action against the private respondents who are threatening to kill the petitioner as well as his family members. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that despite the decision of the civil dispute between the petitioner and private respondents, in favour of the petitioner on 08.07.2024, the private respondents in utter disobedience to the order of the Court are harassing and threatening the petitioner and his family members. On 30.5.2025, the private respondents came to the house of the petitioner and threatened him either to hand over the land in question to them or to face dire consequences. Again on 03.06.2025, the private respondents armed with sticks came to the land of the petitioner and after stopping his tractor threatened to kill him. Respondent No.3 raised lalkara saying that they would occupy the land and would kill the petitioner, but the petitioner somehow managed to run away. Thereafter, the petitioner moved a complaint dated 03.06.2025 to the police against the private respondents but KOMAL 2025.07.03 17:57 I attest to the accuracy of this document CRM-M-33940-2025 (O&M) -2- till date no action has been taken, rather the police officials are forcing the petitioner to withdraw his complaint or to face dire consequences. The petitioner is a senior citizen and had served the nation in Boarder Security Force for several years and his both sons are living abroad, whereas his daughter-in-law and grand children, who are residing with him, are also being threatened by the private respondents. The son of the petitioner also moved a complaint Annexure P2 before Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur. Thereafter, the petitioner also moved representation dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) before respondent No.2, but no action on the same has been taken till date. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he would be satisfied if the representation dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure P-3), which had already been moved by the petitioner is looked into. Notice of motion. Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice and submitted that she has no objection if the aforesaid representation dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) is looked into. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Gurdaspur, to look into the aforesaid representation and to take appropriate action as per law, if any required at the earliest. Disposed of. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 03.07.2025. Komal Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.07.03 17:57 I attest to the accuracy of this document