Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7244 (UTT)

Jai Ram v. State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS

WPSB/143/2018 · 2025-06-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB No. 143 of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Dr. Udyog Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Puran Singh Bisht, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent nos. 1 to 3. 3. Mr. Ishwari Dutt Paliwal, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh / respondent no. 4. 4. This writ petition was filed by petitioner seeking a direction to respondent nos. 1 to 3 to allocate him State of Uttar Pradesh under Section 74 of U.P. Reorganisation Act. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that during pendency of writ petition, petitioner has attained age of superannuation and now he is retired. Thus, he submits that the reliefs as claimed in the writ petition do not survive any longer. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, .J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, .J.) 11.06.2025 Navin