RAM AVTAR AND OTHERS v. UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THROUGH ITS ADVISOR AND OTHERS
CWP/17725/2025 · 2025-07-01
Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72438 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72438 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
169
CWP-17725-2025
Date of Decision: 01.07.2025
RAM AVTAR AND OTHERS
.......PETITONERS
Versus UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH THROUGH ITS ADVISOR AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present:- Mr. Shubham Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Abhinav Sood, Addl. Standing Counsel, U.T., Chandigarh.
***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
In the light of the present petition involving disputed questions of fact, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioners to avail their remedy before the Civil Court, in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
[DEEPAK SIBAL]
JUDGE
[LAPITA BANERJI] 01.07.2025
JUDGE Prince
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No PRINCE SAINI 2025.07.01 03:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document