IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 206 Satnam Singh State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. 22.05.2017, vide which of Senior Assistant has been rejected. 2. Commissioner, Ferozepur Division, dated 04.07.2019, wherein it has been stated that the petitioner dur matter of fact, promoted as Senior Assistant, vide order dated 25.01.2019, Annexure R 3. 4. approach the respondent 30.07.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Satnam Singh Versus State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CH Mr. Lovish Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made is for quashing the orders dated 22.05.2017, vide which claim of the petitioner of Senior Assistant has been rejected. Learned State counsel refers to Commissioner, Ferozepur Division, dated 04.07.2019, wherein it has been stated that the petitioner during pendency of the present case was, as a fact, promoted as Senior Assistant, vide order dated 25.01.2019, Annexure R-7/T, thus, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. There is no rebuttal to the aforesaid by filing any replica Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to approach the respondent-department in case any grievance still subsists. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28416-2017 (O & M) Date of decision: 30.07.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made is for quashing the orders dated 07.09.2016 and claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post Learned State counsel refers to para 3 of affidavit of the Commissioner, Ferozepur Division, dated 04.07.2019, wherein it has been ing pendency of the present case was, as a fact, promoted as Senior Assistant, vide order dated 25.01.2019, 7/T, thus, the present petition has been rendered infructuous. There is no rebuttal to the aforesaid by filing any replication. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to department in case any grievance still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.31 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.