- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43895 WP No. 32201 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 32201 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MALAMMA W/O M. MOHAN AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT DODDAMARANAGOWDANAHALLI VILLAGE & POST, ILAVALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK & DISTRICT. 2. SRI. M. ANNDAREDDY S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.61, CHINTHALAMADIVALA HUNNOORU ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU-560099. 3. SRI. M. RAVIKUMAR S/O LATE MOHAN AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/AT DODDAMARANAHALLI ILAVALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK & DISTRICT. 4. SRI. N. CHANDRAREDDY S/O LATE NANJAREDDY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.136, 6TH MAIN ROAD, 12TH CROSS, B.T.M. LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560048. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43895 WP No. 32201 of 2019 5. SRI LAKSHMANAMURTHY C. M. S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA AED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.48, Y N R BUILDING, YERANDAHALLI JIGANI POST, ANEKAL BENGALURU-560016. 6. SMT. SHANTHAMMA W/O SWAMYGOWDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT DODDAMARANAHALLI ILAVALA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK & DISTRICT. 7. SMT. N. SUVARNA S/O ANANDAREDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.E-445, HEBBAGODI GOLLAHALLI, CHANDAPURA POST ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU-560100. 8. SRI. M. MUNIREDDY C/O P CHANNAREDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, B.T.M. LAYOUT, 1ST PHASE, 4TH MAIN ROAD, JAIBHEMANAGARA, BENGALURU-560048. 9. SMT. M. RADHA W/O GOPALAREDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.66 NEAR ANNAPURNESHWARI TEMPLE ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU RURAL-560099. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43895 WP No. 32201 of 2019 10. SMT. H.N. PUSHPA W/O MANJUNATHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YARS, R/ATN O.E-445 HEBBAGODI GOLLAHALLI CHANDAPURA CIRCLE ANEKAL BENGALURU DISTRICT-560100. 11. SMT. NALINA W/O NARAYANAREDDY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO.23/4, 4TH CROSS, VENKATESHWARA LAYOUT JAIBHEEMANAGARA BENGALURU-560068. 12. SMT. UMADEVI W/O KUNNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT : DODDAMARAGOWDANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, ILAVALA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AJIT KALYAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING, VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43895 WP No. 32201 of 2019 2. KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, CAUVERY BHAVAN, K G ROAD BENGALURU-560009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI. H.L. PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENTS DATED 16.02.2017 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANENXURE-A, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10 AND A11; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1 In this writ petition, petitioners are assailing the Endorsements dated 16.02.2017 produced at Annexure-A - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43895 WP No. 32201 of 2019 Series, inter alia, sought for a direction to respondent No.2 to allot a site as mentioned in Annexure-E series to the petition. 2. Heard Sri. Ajit Kalyan, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri. Mahantesh Shettar, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1 and Sri. H.L. Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it is forthcoming from the petition, that the petitioners have approached the respondent No.2 for allotment of sites. It is also forthcoming that the sites in respect of which petitioners are seeking allotment, have already been allotted to some of the incumbent allottees as per the Endorsements dated 16.02.2017 issued at Annexure-A series. 4. In that view of the matter, I find force in the submission made by the learned counsel for respondent No.2, that as and when respondent No.2 will call for applications for allotment of sites henceforth, during such time, it is open for the petitioners to make appropriate application in a manner known to law and if such an application is made by the petitioners, same shall be - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43895 WP No. 32201 of 2019 considered by the respondent - authority. It is made clear that while considering the case of the other applicants, it is open for respondent No.2 to consider the application made by the petitioners herein, in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4